Can Medicine Survive Modern Society?

Sack of Rome

David Hume, Scottish philosopher, said reason is slave to the passions.

Aristotle insisted knowledge required questions. If we cannot ask, ideas never improve. Policy becomes artifact. Then social media turns it into an endless siren of emotion: too often, doctors screeching at each other.

Historians tell us we live at the end of an age, perhaps even the twilight of a civilization. The fabric required to practice medicine wears thin.

Polybius (200-118 BC), a Greek historian, wrote that kings become tyrants, aristocrats become oligarchs, and members of democracies become mobs. A mob feels deeply, convinced of its own self-righteousness. Civility fades and barbarians emerge nasty and cruel, filled with anger and spite.

As Western civilization declines and democracy becomes mob rule, medicine becomes an anachronism, an artifact from the Greek age of reason. By age and disposition, medicine seems more and more out of place in modern society.

Medicine needs three things to survive: civility, logic, and free speech.

Civil Traditions

Civility is more than knowing the rules required to live in civil society. Social skill follows immersion in civil traditions. We develop a second nature of civility and become citizens (see Hannah Arendt quote below).

We have lost the spirit of civil traditions as well as the traditions themselves. We cannot regain the traditions without knowing the spirit animating them.

We cannot be Scottish by just donning kilt and pipes.  To be a Scot means more than just doing Scottish things. We become Scots first, and Scottish things follow. A cowboy in a kilt with bagpipes on his saddle is not Scottish.

Can people regain civility if they never knew the institution in the first place?

Can those who were polite, simply because it was fashionable, learn to be polite when the fashion fades? Continue reading “Can Medicine Survive Modern Society?”

After Authority, Power

Armed authority or power? (photo credit below)

Authority is received, not taken. You can take control but not authority. Authority is given.

Strength and intelligence may increase the likelihood of winning and retaining authority. They clearly increase power. But they do not guarantee authority. A leader can lose authority before power and retain authority long after losing power.

COVID uncovered a profound weakness in society and in medicine. We have abandoned our basis of authority.

Robert Nisbet, sociologist, wrote “The Twilight of Authority,” in 1975. At first, I thought it meant wet-diaper politics and the loss of consequences: weak sentences for horrific crimes, that sort of thing. But these consequences are just instruments of power. The one who wields them may have no authority in the eyes of those he afflicts.

A prime minister may choose to snorkel or surf on the day he set up for mourning. He can create the holiday and enforce compliance. But he undermines his own authority by ignoring his creation.

Authority Defined

Every system requires authority to function. To what will we bow? What will we never fight against? Continue reading “After Authority, Power”

Can Conservatism Save Healthcare?

I roamed the limits of libertarianism and found a bunch of guys having a party on a cruise ship.

It was fun. It was free. But no one could explain how the ship got there.

I started asking, Who made the boat? Where should we sail? And what should we do when we get there?

These are dangerous questions. Anything with ‘we’ in it can trigger a libertarian. (I have even been called a communist recently!)

What exists beyond the libertarian party ship?

Panem’s Peacekeepers stand guard back on shore. (If not Hunger Games, insert Stormtroopers or some other symbol of authoritarianism.)

Does anything exist beyond ship or shore?

Conservatism in Healthcare

I wish we had a better word.

Conservatism is so old and plastered with bad ideas promoted by bad actors, many find it useless. One friend spit out his coffee and teased about his smoking jacket and corduroy slippers. Point taken.

If we can get over the goofy images associated with the word, conservatism offers ways to think which will sound radical to our liberal ears.

As I argued in How to Get Canada of the Healthcare Teeter Totter, we need to start looking beyond liberalism.

The Accad-Koka Report picked up the article and had me on the show to discuss how political conservatism might help healthcare.

If you prefer podcasts, you can listen below:

Or you can watch the interview:

More work …

I realise this falls outside the training and comfort of most doctors. But nothing changes in healthcare unless doctors help lead it. As such, we need to spend time with political philosophy.

Just because you do not take an interest in politics does not mean politics will not take an interest in you.

Pericles, 430 B.C.

Thanks for checking it out!

 Photo credit: Cruise Deals Expert