Wait Times Secret for Best in Province ED

Healthcare wait timesIf you want to achieve the best wait times in the province, you need to know your hourly wait times, in minutes.  Averages wait times, or wait times at specific times in the day, will not work.  You need to know how your department functions every hour, down to the minute. (We had the best time to physician initial assessment in 2013-2014 at <1.5 hr 90th percentile.)

 

Clinicians need a thermometer

Managers need an operations report

Board members need a budget

You need hourly wait times reports

Instantaneous Wait Times

To drive change, you need live data, like a thermometer.  Patients benefit when providers change their behaviour based on feedback from data about immediate circumstance.

Sure, yesterday’s information helps, if clinicians can remember what they did yesterday.  Invariably, horrendous cases or surges in volume stick out in our memories from yesterday.  The thousands of banal decisions made that truly impacted performance never get remembered.  They reside in the background of our thinking, safe from examination.

Change happens when data becomes available in the moment.  Hour by hour data can pinpoint who was working at a particular time and what care was being given.

Real time data allows leadership to query performance and address it immediately.

To get the best wait times in Ontario, we had to ask decision support to report hourly waits in minutes.  Hourly reporting supported, or corrected, hunches we had about when wait times lagged.  Once we had the right data, we could start trying creative solutions to improve.

Average Wait Times

‘Average’ causes pain and suffering.  Reporting averages in healthcare is like reporting the average number of parachutes required for passengers jumping out of a plane.

Average wait times, average patient volumes, and average provider work speed mean nothing to a patient standing in line with tearing chest pain.  Leaders should get a bit upset when they hear averages reported, or at the very least, ignore them.

What do you think?  When you ask about wait times, are you getting performance from the last quarter?  Are you asking for the right kind of data?

Please share your thoughts below.   If you enjoyed this post, consider signing up for posts to your email.  Thank you!

(photo credit: carp.ca)

Patient-Centred vs. Provider-Centred

Patient-centeredWhile discussing over-crowding and ‘safe, quality care’,  a retired nurse manager said, “It’s all about doing what’s best for the patients.”  She told me, “People try to call it patient safety, but it’s just covering your butt.”

Motivations to help patients versus protect ourselves start to compete when Medicare runs short of money.

With enough resources, providers can protect themselves and focus on patient benefit.  When resources get scarce, providers often have to choose between patient benefit and self-protection.

For example, no one gets criticized for providing ‘really great care’ inside an emergency department or on an inpatient ward.  They’re patient-centred.  But providers can spend as much time as they want with patients only if they make other patients wait for hours (days!) in the ED waiting room or admitted in ED hallways.  Providers can champion ideal care settings – proper rooms, great infection control – only by forcing other patients to endure no bed, no quiet, and no infection control in an ED hallway or waiting room.

No one will fault a nurse or physician for working ‘really hard’ and doing a ‘really good job’ with his patients.  Discharge excellence, thorough education, exploration of psychosocial factors; no one can criticize a provider for ‘working hard’ to be patient-centred.

Are We Patient-Centred?

Are we really working hard for patients or are we just covering our butts?  Are we avoiding the risk of having to see a new patient in a less-than-ideal setting?  Are we aiming for ‘faultless’ care for our patient because we want what’s best for patients, or because we want what’s best for us?

But we’re already at the 25th percentile for length of stay!  What more can we do?

Even if care gets trimmed down to the shortest possible, leaving patients to languish in hallways and waiting rooms goes against everything healthcare believes in.  Both emergency departments and inpatient services do the same thing.  EDs leave patients in waiting rooms; wards leave patients in the ED.

Our system does not have resources to allow providers to give ideal care all the time.  Even if you don’t have enough to give patients your best, you can still give them something; letting them languish in the waiting room or ED is egregious.

Healthcare providers can describe their concerns in terms of quality, professionalism or patient benefit without being patient-centred.  When we make these comments in the face of unconscionable waits and suffering elsewhere – suffering that we could do something to alleviate – we are just “covering our butt.”

What do you think?  What role does self-protection play in our refusal to get patients out of the waiting room or up to the wards?

If you liked this post, please comment or consider signing up for email updates.  Thanks for reading!

(The photo comes from an MSF page about Patient-Centred care for TB patients in Armenia.  Check it out, too.)

Canadian Medicare: Toronto MD smacks down U.S. Senate

Toronto doctor smacks down U.S. Senate question on Canadian waitlist deaths | National Post.

I appreciate Dr. Martin’s quick wit in deflecting a question with an attack on the questioner.

Nice move.

The Toronto Star gushed about Dr. Martin being best suited to represent the values of the Canadian health care system. Apparently, the Huffington Post said she just became Canada’s newest hero.

Debates like this make change almost impossible.  They entrench discussion into a debate about Canadian distinctiveness compared with our southern neighbour, completely missing the point.

We need to debate what’s best for patients.

Has ANYONE in the world copied Canadian Medicare?

If our system was as great as Martin says, don’t you think someone – anyone – would have copied it?

No, ideological devotion blinds Dr. Martin, the media, and most of the rest of us to the need for change in our beloved Medicare.