Politicians confront impossible decisions. Do they fund education or healthcare? Do they fix poverty or illiteracy?
Our leaders live out Sophie’s Choice all the time, one child goes to die and the other lives.
At least that’s what you’re supposed to think.
Meryl Streep won an academy award as Sophie. She chose her son, Jan, for the children’s camp. Her daughter, Eva, went to the gas chambers. Watch the movie.
Healthcare versus Windmills
Premier Wynne and Health Minister Hoskins deserve an award, too. They insist that the only way to pay for teachers and nurses is to cut doctors.
They say doctors got a raise. That’s like saying school enrolment went up so we hired hundreds more teachers, which produced a raise for teachers.
Politicians repeat it so often; we must assume they think voters stupid enough to believe it.
Moral philosophy classes used to be taught using impossible moral dilemmas.
“Suppose a train is approaching 2 tracks and must choose one.
Your only daughter plays on one track, and a school bus full of children sits stalled across the tracks on the other line.
You control a switch to send the train down either track.
The train has no brakes.
Which track do you choose?”
Wynne and Hoskins face a dilemma: cut projects like Wind Turbines, or fund healthcare. But it’s not a moral dilemma. They face a personal dilemma, a challenge of integrity.
Do they admit bad decisions, or do they put a hard cap on healthcare?
Patients want to know. Will the system be there for me when I need it, as I get older? Patients can see that caps on spending won’t hurt immediately. They understand that it will take time.
Arbitration, Not Legislation
Doctors will not act against patients. They will always care for their own. But doctors will not accept more complex, elderly patients.
They cannot.
The province penalizes doctors for seeing more, providing more care. The province claws back doctors’ billing for seeing more patients. The province put a hard cap on medical spending.
We can do better than this. We can build a system that’s great for patients and fair for doctors and nurses. We need to start with patient needs at the center.
- What will the aging baby boomers need?
- How can we plan to meet their medical needs?
- Does cutting doctors now help us meet those needs?
Everyone makes mistakes. Politicians need a wide swath of grace. We’d all screw-up if we were in office. That’s why we elect politicians, not actors. We elect character, not panache.
It is government’s responsibility to get back to table and fix this mess. Get an agreement with doctors.
Doctors cannot strike. They can only take legal action as a proxy for job action. And doctors will do it. We have no other choice. It will take years to settle. Let’s hope it happens before cuts hurt patients. Let’s hope Premier Wynne wakes up and starts funding healthcare versus windmills.
photo credit: news.ontario.ca