Truckers Freedom Convoy 2022 – Support, Oppose, or Tolerate?

Truckers Freedom Convoy
Truckers Freedom Convoy (credit below)

“Hey Doc … so should I get the booster or what?”

He had just recovered from COVID — for him, a mild flu in a fully vaccinated man. Public Health advises boosters. Docs have been warned to avoid saying otherwise.

The average person is smarter on many things than most elites allow. Patients know vaccine mandates make less sense at the end of the pandemic than they may have at the beginning.

Good today, Bad Tomorrow

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau praised truckers at the beginning of the pandemic and encouraged all Canadians to do the same. Now he calls truckers a “small fringe minority” with “unacceptable views.”

Stop for a minute.

This sounds like a dream come true. Trudeau should cheer. Welcome the fringe. Get them to the capital, ASAP. Show the world the nonsense of their fringe views.

“Fringe” Views vs. traditional liberalism

JS Mill argued we should welcome views we oppose. Let people speak — they will prove the stupidity of their position without you having to say a word.

But Trudeau is not a traditional liberal. He is a modern man, intolerant of those with whom he disagrees. His ideas are true and righteous. Others are fringe, ignorant, or maleficent — “unacceptable”.

The illiberal elite slice society into good and bad, sheep and goats. Intolerance is just. We must not tolerate evil. Herbert Marcuse, philosopher, called it “repressive tolerance.”

Masks and Mandates

“Excuse me, Dr. Whatley. Should we wear N95 masks for this patient.”

Of course. Yes!

We need gown, gloves, goggles, and N95 masks. This patient may have been in contact with someone who just tested positive!

But so could any of the last ten patients.

We wore regular masks for them. Many of the those patients — all potential ‘contacts’ — wore cloth masks … or surgical masks soaked through with dirt, snot, and who knows what.

Reason and Fury

For almost two years, a crowd of doctors have pounded the COVID drums. Their fury swells as severity wanes. They alone are right. They are protectors of healthcare. Do not talk about cancelled surgeries — COVID counts are all that matter.

Reason fails in the face of illiberalism.

Indeed, liberalism depends on reason too much. It forgets about emotion.

“Once at the center of the study of politics, emotions have led a shadow existence for the last three decades [since 1970], with no place in the rationalistic, structural, and organizational models that dominate academic political analysis.”

(see Passionate Politics – Emotions and Social Movements)

Truckers Freedom Convoy

Sunlight improves almost everything. The best way to keep something festering is to cover it up.

Letting people talk has been an essential ingredient to the success of parliamentary democracy.

Absolutely, it has been messy and confusing. But it has delivered incomparable human flourishing. No other approach comes close.

Truckers Freedom Convoy
Did it set a world record?

Canadians are finally speaking up. Smiling. Waving flags. Joining together.

If the truckers freedom convoy is wrong and misguided, the error will show through immediately. There is no reason to worry. No need to be upset or irritated with them. Truth will prevail.

But if this movement has a point to make, we should listen. Even if we disagree, we should tolerate the difference in opinion. Silencing difference never turns out well.

I hope the truckers freedom convoy brings out the best in what it means to live in a free, parliamentary democracy. Society is only as good as those who get involved.

Photo credits: Freedom Convoy, Snopes: Did it set a world record?

How to Get Canada Off the Healthcare Teeter-Totter

Canadian medicare teeter-totters between two kinds of liberalism: classical and modern. We will never improve until we inject new ideas.

Inside the right-of-centre political parties, the classical liberals fight with the philosophical conservatives for supremacy.  For the last two decades, the classical liberals have won.

If we want medicare to improve, we cannot keep using the same tired ideas. I suggest the right-of-centre political parties need to draw on classical liberalism plus conservatism.

This article published in The Hub explains what I mean and offers a concrete policy problem to start the discussion.

Enjoy!

Shawn Whatley: How to get Canada off the health-care teeter-totter

Liberalism works when you are healthy but fails when you fall ill.

Classical liberalism emphasizes autonomy, individual freedom, and free markets. These ideas have fuelled centuries of wealth and prosperity.

Modern liberalism, in contrast, pursues central decision-making and equality of outcome. Despite similar names and obvious differences, neither type of liberalism provides arguments for everything patients need.

When classical liberalism fails in patient care, it creates space for modern liberalism. Modern liberalism then applies central decision-making which creates inefficiency and bureaucracy. This in turn creates a call for efficiency, deregulation, and policy based on economic liberalism.

This seesaw creates a policy teeter-totter with each type of liberalism pumping furiously at either end.

The failure of liberalism cannot be solved by more liberalism. Only a coalition of classical liberalism plus conservatism will allow Canada off the health policy teeter-totter.

How Liberalism fails

Successful ideas explain reality and suggest solutions to life’s messiest problems. Political ideas fail when they do not reflect reality or cannot explain human experience.

Given liberalism’s dominance in Canadian politics, we should ask how it performs for patients. Does it make sense when patients need it most? Classical liberalism delivers advanced technology, therapeutics, and almost magical cures, but can it deliver care to patients?

Classical liberalism fails to fit patient care in two areas. First, it fails in trauma and acute care. Car crashes and strokes often create dependent, comatose patients. Free agents lose control, and agency passes to a third party.

An unconscious patient is not a rare or special case of information asymmetry, common in professional relationships. Unconsciousness is not a theoretical gap market thinking can overcome; it is an infinite and insuperable knowledge gap. And it occurs hundreds of times each day across Canada. …

Continue reading at The Hub.

Politics by Polling – Elxn44

Justin Trudeau on a pandemic mission for majority

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s magic mirror must have given the wrong answer. Who really is the fairest in the land?

Or perhaps Trudeau could not forget 230,000 more Canadians voted for Scheer in 2019. Maybe he worried management of the pandemic would overshadow the rest of his term.

Or maybe Justin wanted a majority … bad enough to call an election in a pandemic … after only 18 months in office … in which he got everything he ever asked for from parliament … in the midst of a botched withdrawal from Afghanistan … with no real policy issue to debate …

Plebeians will never know.

No matter who wins, healthcare can expect the biggest influx of cash in fifty years. Each party promises to double competitors’ spending.  And they guarantee better management. After all, this is the Canadian way: do not change anything, just spend more. The status quo should remain intact for another few years.

Politics by Polling

A friend told me to listen to Maxime Bernier on Jordon Peterson’s podcast.

I know very little about either of them. They each seem somewhat tragic figures who stick to their principles and ignore personal cost. They produce more content than I can consume. And (I hate to admit) they often make me feel uncomfortable. If only I had half their courage.

But I listened … Continue reading “Politics by Polling – Elxn44”