Stealing Millions from Patient Care

Ben FranklinBen Franklin told a young tradesman, “Time is money.” In an age of distraction, everything takes time. Economists call it opportunity cost. Do you stay out late after dinner, or prepare for the next day? Is an eMBA worth the effort?

Successful businesses know that new work costs money. Either old tasks go undone, or you hire staff to tackle new projects. Corporations go broke if they don’t pay close attention to how workers spend time on the job.

Stealing Millions from Patient Care – One example

Our team received a final notice from our site admin. Every physician must complete a survey, or we lose funding for our electronic medical record (EMR). The survey had close to 100 questions and took 2 hours to read carefully and answer accurately.

[Full disclosure: I love EMRs, IT and clinical tools of all sorts. I think we need more informatics, not less.]

Over 11,000 Ontario physicians on EMR x 2 hours = 22,000 hours of clinical time spent on 1 survey.

 = 9.6 years (22,000 / (50 hours per week x 46 weeks per year)).

 = $3.252 million for 1 survey [9.6 years x $340,000 (average gross billings)]

Of course, time spent away from clinical care saves the government money. Docs get dozens of similar non-clinical requests.

Administrative Off-Load

Efficient hospital-based medical groups remain on high alert to admin off-load. Hospital administrators love to build arguments for why a specific administrative task requires an MD (e.g. RM&R forms for community nursing, Transfer forms for mental health patients).

It saves hospitals money. If they can convince docs to do something, it means they don’t have to hire staff using hospital funds. MDs get paid from OHIP, not hospitals.

Laziness and Efficiency

Vice often drives virtue. Laziness makes us to look for easier ways to work. My Scottish Granny might have harrumphed, “You find shortcuts so you can do MORE work, not less!

Ok. But we still don’t spend our time looking for ways to make work harder. Unless you’re a bureaucrat. Bureaucracy slows things down, resists change, ‘manages’ innovation.

Bizzaro World

In nationalized services, governments save money by slowing down their most expensive assets. They save by shutting down MRIs, closing operating rooms and shackling physicians with as much non-clinical work as possible. Up is down and down is up in Bizzaro world.

$3.25 million dollars of potential patient care wasted on one survey is only a shaving off a lumber pile of waste. If politicians were serious about efficiency, they would insist on freeing up doctors so patients could receive more care.

But more care costs money; who wants that?

photo credit: currencyguide.eu

Medical Dreams, Doctors & Unionism

GPWe all want free, accessible, high-quality care close to home. Patients want to choose doctors who provide great service and avoid those who do not.

For the most part, doctors want this too. The trouble comes with how to make it happen. It tangles our visions of ideal medical care, politics and doctors’ collective action into a massive challenge with a scary future.

There are 3 parts to the challenge.

  1. Idealized visions stand at opposite ends of a care spectrum.
  2. Politicians craft healthcare solutions along partisan lines.
  3. Doctors collectively respond to the solutions.

Lets start with two visions of medical care:

Medical Dream #1

  • Salaried doctors with pensions and benefits.
  • Standardized visits.
  • Protocol-ized treatment.
  • Maximum decision support.
  • Quality by design.
  • Doctors as clinicians, not managers.
  • Doctors diagnose and treat.

Medical Dream #2

  • Doctors as small business owners.
  • Individualized patient visits.
  • Individualized treatment informed by evidence.
  • Quality by incentives, flexible design.
  • Doctors as professionals in the fullest sense, not solely clinicians.
  • Doctors diagnose, treat, lead, oversee and manage.

Of course, the dreams overlap and blur into dozens of options. Those who support vision 1 tend to believe we should fund it with higher taxes, lower fees for high billing doctors and lower incomes for MDs overall. Vision 1 requires greater government control.

Problems with #1

  • Doctors become clock-watchers attuned to breaks and quitting time.
  • Wait times soar.
  • Not sensitive to individual patient need.
  • Inflexible.
  • Docs see fewer patients; need more docs = higher costs/patient
  • Demoralizing to professionals.
  • Doctors stop thinking and just follow the rules.
  • Removing input makes physicians ignore system issues. Why bother?

Problems with #2

  • What patients want is not always the same as medical need.
  • Many doctors hate business.
  • Might reward cutting corners.
  • Busy doctors earning high incomes inflames public envy.
  • Individualized therapy costs more than guideline-based treatment.

Canadian Compromise

Faced with different medical dreams, politicians work to blend the best of both approaches, slanted toward their political ideal, all in a socialized setting. This compromise works okay when times are good but falls apart under pressure.

Picture a 250 lb. football player and a 100 lb. ballerina as a team in a three-legged race. Inevitably, the brute throws a sweaty arm around his partner to carry or drag her to victory.

As government runs out of money, politicians swing doctors into their bureaucratic axillae to get things done.

As Good as It Got

In many ways, we have lived through healthcare utopia. Medicare used to let doctors work like local grocery store owners, while bureaucrats coordinated supplies and infrastructure. The College of Physicians and Surgeons contented itself with catching the really bad guys and leaving grocers to their vegetables.

Times have changed. Government now wants to run the grocery stores, and the College wants to go through the grocers’ laundry. Brazen reporters demand politicians do their bidding. Politicians click their heels and obey to avoid a drop in public opinion polls.

A Brute of Our Own

In the face of power imbalance, eventually, someone fights back. The ballerinas of the world find their own brutes to team up with the footballers. Ontario’s doctors will do the same.

Police, nurses and teachers’ unions win consistent raises while doctors get 5 years of cuts. Despite tyranny, inefficiency, and entitled greed of some union bosses, many doctors want a bossy, greedy, mercenary union to fight for them. They would love to have union reps fight every little workplace grievance. Doctors want a gorilla to fight all the other (unionized) stakeholders in the system.

Unionism

Public sector unionization rises above 74% in Canada. Political campaign managers estimate 30% of voters are union members. As dependancy ratios continue to creep up, voters will support parties that promise handouts.

A big, fat Ontario Medial Association Union is almost inevitable in this environment. It will flex and bloat and crush everything. It will support governments that wink at big labour with higher taxes. It will shape Ontario’s future, not just for healthcare.

A well-funded union of 35,000 physicians will ensure all change swerves left towards bigger government and more control. Political parties will only win if they kiss big labour. It’s unclear whether this will help healthcare, but maybe it’s what Premier Wynne planned all along?

photo credit: GP Contract Changes May Hit Services, Says Doctors’ Union TheGuardian.com

Superlative Healthcare – The Small Office

patient-doctors-office-waiting-horizontal-large-galleryPoliticians dream of efficient healthcare. Patients look for service, access and quality. Physicians want freedom to deliver outstanding, high-quality care designed around patient needs, not bureaucracy. We all want superlative healthcare.

It already exists. Or at least it could, if we let it.

The secret does not lie with integration, IT, collaboration, transitions of care, prevention, oversight, quality management, screening, or all the other things you hear about. These all help and are necessary. But none of them can do everything.

The Secret to Superlative Healthcare

The small doctor’s office offers the best hope for patients, politicians and providers. Here’s an example:

A physician showed me her clinic recently. She holds the mortgage on 1000 square feet in a newer professional strip plaza and renovated it to hold up to 3 physicians (only 2 currently). Twenty-foot ceilings allow for a mezzanine. It is simple, clean, bright and attractive. She works 6 days per week, with one full time and one part-time secretary. A massage therapy clinic leases a mezzanine and offers easy access for her patients.

She knows all her patients – has a relationship with them – and wants to see them healthy. Her patients know she’s devoted to them. She shows it.

But she also wants efficiency. She knows that waste means fewer resources for her patients.

Owner Operator

If her patients need mental health services, in-office nursing care, or any other allied health service, why would we design a system that sends patients away from an office like hers?

If we funded this physician to hire a healthcare worker, we have every reason to expect that she’d apply the same expectations of patient-focused, high-quality, efficient care for the new staff.

Would she tolerate

  • Long breaks between patient visits?
  • Notes that require more time to write than time spent with patients?
  • Leaving appointments open on the schedule?

Never.

She would expect the same focus on patient service and efficiency that she applies to herself. Wasted resources mean fewer resources for other patients.

New Programs

So, why do bureaucrats insist on creating new behemoths, with weighty tomes of policies and procedures, so that allied health can ‘integrate’ with primary care, in a separate location? How does this help patients? Every new solution seems big, and wasteful.

Of course, not all offices run like the one described. But many do. The ones that do not, go out of business or move into government run clinics.

Superlative healthcare starts with small physician businesses. Ideology prevents government from ceding resources or control to physicians. Government wants to control as much as possible. It needs resources for the bureaucratic giants it designs and runs.

Small is Good for Patients

We do not use the excellence that already exists. Let’s let physicians lead and design care around patients’ needs. Let’s push government into a supportive role and let the front-line professionals meet the needs of patients they know and love.

Physicians could replace the work of many bureaucrats if they were allowed to manage resources through their own offices. The secret to superlative healthcare isn’t radical. It’s obvious. But it might require fewer bureaucratic jobs.

It’s difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on him not understanding it.

Upton Sinclair

 photo credit: cnn.com