Truckers Freedom Convoy 2022 – Support, Oppose, or Tolerate?

Truckers Freedom Convoy
Truckers Freedom Convoy (credit below)

“Hey Doc … so should I get the booster or what?”

He had just recovered from COVID — for him, a mild flu in a fully vaccinated man. Public Health advises boosters. Docs have been warned to avoid saying otherwise.

The average person is smarter on many things than most elites allow. Patients know vaccine mandates make less sense at the end of the pandemic than they may have at the beginning.

Good today, Bad Tomorrow

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau praised truckers at the beginning of the pandemic and encouraged all Canadians to do the same. Now he calls truckers a “small fringe minority” with “unacceptable views.”

Stop for a minute.

This sounds like a dream come true. Trudeau should cheer. Welcome the fringe. Get them to the capital, ASAP. Show the world the nonsense of their fringe views.

“Fringe” Views vs. traditional liberalism

JS Mill argued we should welcome views we oppose. Let people speak — they will prove the stupidity of their position without you having to say a word.

But Trudeau is not a traditional liberal. He is a modern man, intolerant of those with whom he disagrees. His ideas are true and righteous. Others are fringe, ignorant, or maleficent — “unacceptable”.

The illiberal elite slice society into good and bad, sheep and goats. Intolerance is just. We must not tolerate evil. Herbert Marcuse, philosopher, called it “repressive tolerance.”

Masks and Mandates

“Excuse me, Dr. Whatley. Should we wear N95 masks for this patient.”

Of course. Yes!

We need gown, gloves, goggles, and N95 masks. This patient may have been in contact with someone who just tested positive!

But so could any of the last ten patients.

We wore regular masks for them. Many of the those patients — all potential ‘contacts’ — wore cloth masks … or surgical masks soaked through with dirt, snot, and who knows what.

Reason and Fury

For almost two years, a crowd of doctors have pounded the COVID drums. Their fury swells as severity wanes. They alone are right. They are protectors of healthcare. Do not talk about cancelled surgeries — COVID counts are all that matter.

Reason fails in the face of illiberalism.

Indeed, liberalism depends on reason too much. It forgets about emotion.

“Once at the center of the study of politics, emotions have led a shadow existence for the last three decades [since 1970], with no place in the rationalistic, structural, and organizational models that dominate academic political analysis.”

(see Passionate Politics – Emotions and Social Movements)

Truckers Freedom Convoy

Sunlight improves almost everything. The best way to keep something festering is to cover it up.

Letting people talk has been an essential ingredient to the success of parliamentary democracy.

Absolutely, it has been messy and confusing. But it has delivered incomparable human flourishing. No other approach comes close.

Truckers Freedom Convoy
Did it set a world record?

Canadians are finally speaking up. Smiling. Waving flags. Joining together.

If the truckers freedom convoy is wrong and misguided, the error will show through immediately. There is no reason to worry. No need to be upset or irritated with them. Truth will prevail.

But if this movement has a point to make, we should listen. Even if we disagree, we should tolerate the difference in opinion. Silencing difference never turns out well.

I hope the truckers freedom convoy brings out the best in what it means to live in a free, parliamentary democracy. Society is only as good as those who get involved.

Photo credits: Freedom Convoy, Snopes: Did it set a world record?

Can Medicine Survive Modern Society?

Sack of Rome

David Hume, Scottish philosopher, said reason is slave to the passions.

Aristotle insisted knowledge required questions. If we cannot ask, ideas never improve. Policy becomes artifact. Then social media turns it into an endless siren of emotion: too often, doctors screeching at each other.

Historians tell us we live at the end of an age, perhaps even the twilight of a civilization. The fabric required to practice medicine wears thin.

Polybius (200-118 BC), a Greek historian, wrote that kings become tyrants, aristocrats become oligarchs, and members of democracies become mobs. A mob feels deeply, convinced of its own self-righteousness. Civility fades and barbarians emerge nasty and cruel, filled with anger and spite.

As Western civilization declines and democracy becomes mob rule, medicine becomes an anachronism, an artifact from the Greek age of reason. By age and disposition, medicine seems more and more out of place in modern society.

Medicine needs three things to survive: civility, logic, and free speech.

Civil Traditions

Civility is more than knowing the rules required to live in civil society. Social skill follows immersion in civil traditions. We develop a second nature of civility and become citizens (see Hannah Arendt quote below).

We have lost the spirit of civil traditions as well as the traditions themselves. We cannot regain the traditions without knowing the spirit animating them.

We cannot be Scottish by just donning kilt and pipes.  To be a Scot means more than just doing Scottish things. We become Scots first, and Scottish things follow. A cowboy in a kilt with bagpipes on his saddle is not Scottish.

Can people regain civility if they never knew the institution in the first place?

Can those who were polite, simply because it was fashionable, learn to be polite when the fashion fades? Continue reading “Can Medicine Survive Modern Society?”

After Authority, Power

Armed authority or power? (photo credit below)

Authority is received, not taken. You can take control but not authority. Authority is given.

Strength and intelligence may increase the likelihood of winning and retaining authority. They clearly increase power. But they do not guarantee authority. A leader can lose authority before power and retain authority long after losing power.

COVID uncovered a profound weakness in society and in medicine. We have abandoned our basis of authority.

Robert Nisbet, sociologist, wrote “The Twilight of Authority,” in 1975. At first, I thought it meant wet-diaper politics and the loss of consequences: weak sentences for horrific crimes, that sort of thing. But these consequences are just instruments of power. The one who wields them may have no authority in the eyes of those he afflicts.

A prime minister may choose to snorkel or surf on the day he set up for mourning. He can create the holiday and enforce compliance. But he undermines his own authority by ignoring his creation.

Authority Defined

Every system requires authority to function. To what will we bow? What will we never fight against? Continue reading “After Authority, Power”