Impossible to Manage Doctors?

WalMartBirdHow do they get birds out of Costco?

My kids love to see birds fly around the warehouse. Costco must hate it.

No doubt, birds in Costco break a list of public health rules.

There are three ways to get birds out of a warehouse: kill them, trap them, or encourage behavioural change (see more here and here).

The first two options offer military solutions: dispatch or take custody. Neither approach works well with humans, outside of war or totalitarian control. Does government know this?

Behavioural Change

All leaders work to influence behavioural change. Everything else that they do is wasted effort or should be done by someone else.

Leaders work to change behaviour, not to write policy manuals, discipline protocols, or to file reports to regulators.

Leaders must understand behavioural change, or they are not leaders.

People in positions of leadership often do not understand what they are supposed to do and have no idea how to get it done.

Impossible to Manage

Humans find ways to break rules and turn the most well-intentioned incentives into perverse behaviours.

We can follow the letter of the law but deny its spirit.

We cannot be forced to act, any more than we can think or believe as instructed.

Humans are frustratingly free and complex.

Only people with damaged brains think, believe, and act exactly as told.

Given people’s tendency to make up their own minds, how can leaders change behaviour?

Not Rocket Science

It’s actually quite simple, if we think like a pre-teen. How does an older sister get her brother to play along with something he does not want to do?

She could offer a bribe, but that often ends poorly.

Her brother is young, not stupid. The bribe becomes a quest. He will anchor on the bribe and negotiate to the death. His sister will sacrifice more than she hoped for, or abandon the task.

Every older sister figures out how to manger her younger brother shortly after she learns how to skip rope. If we asked, she would tell us:

First, you need to catch your brother’s interest. Show him something shiny or dangerous.

Then, build on the excitement and invite him into relationship. Hint at the opportunity for more, bigger, shiny things: This sets the hook.

Invite him on a quest. Build a description of the destination together, in vivid detail. Let him shape what the destination looks like to him.

Set him loose with a title and a mission to accomplish.

Then, work together, offering encouragement and praise until the job is done. Remind him of how fun this quest was the next time you need him to do something.

Doesn’t government know this? They find doctors impossible to manage because they forget the basics. They should try to the following:

Catch doctors’ interest: show them an opportunity to fix a patient care problem that frustrates doctors, not accountants or Ministers of Finance.

Build on the interest by fostering relationship. Hint at the opportunity to solve bigger problems together.

Invite doctors on a quest. Let doctors shape and define the destination together with government.

Empower doctors to tackle the quest. Encourage them. Give them the materials they need to get the job done.

Work alongside doctors until the job is finished.

Offer praise liberally. Hint at the next exciting job to tackle.

Is this too simplistic? Probably, but that’s the point. It’s so simple that doctors can see what’s going on. Politicians should want doctors to see through what government is doing and get excited about it.

Politicians need to build trust with dozens of small projects before trying to change all of primary care at once, with something like Bill 210 (see Will Medicine Survive in Ontario).

Entice Change

Birds fly out of Costco when someone attracts the birds to leave. The only other way is to trap or kill them.

Government, regulators, and system managers need to take a new approach to ‘managing’ physicians. Regulatory and legislative traps do not work. System leaders cannot manage doctors like the military. They must entice docs to change. All other options kill doctors’ professional spirit.

photo credit: pbs.org

Summer Reading Under an Oppressive Regime

Books in Office 2015As you roast marshmallows this summer, you can learn how to roast politicians, too.

Oops. Freudian slip.

You can learn how to roast political ideas (if that inspires you more).

A few of you have asked about great books to go with your tan. Here are some of my favourite non-fiction titles designed to ignite revolutionary thoughts from your hammock.  I included only one healthcare title, for now.

Disclosure: I am an Amazon Associate and get a few pennies, if you end up purchasing items, after clicking on the links below. If you’d rather, just search for the titles yourself! Cheers.

Summer Reading


Free to Choose: A Personal Statement

If you vote, you need this book. It is a must read for anyone who cares about freedom.

It is well written, full of great quotes, and packed with fundamental ideas about freedom and democracy.

If you love the Toronto Star and want to live in China or Cuba, you can skip this title. If you plan to stay in a Western democracy, please read Free to Choose.

Doctors do not usually read Friedman, or any similar books. So it’s no wonder that health policies and legislation come out sounding like quotes from Mao or Castro.

Catastrophic Care

Malcolm Gladwell calls this book,

A devastating and utterly original analysis of what has gone wrong with the American health care system. Read it, and take a deep breath.

This book appeals to readers who love to hate the American healthcare system.

It also wins points with those who vote for people like Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

If you think government-run healthcare could do better, you will find ways to make care more like Apple and less like the Post Office.

Goldhill works as a CEO. He supports universal healthcare, but not universally bad care.

From the flap:

In 2007 David Goldhill’s father died from infections acquired in a well-regarded New York hospital.

The bill, for several hundred thousand dollars, was paid by Medicare.

Angered, Goldhill became determined to understand how it was possible that well-trained personnel equipped with world-class technologies could be responsible for such inexcusable carelessness—and how a business that failed so miserably could still be rewarded with full payment.”

The Conservatarian Manifesto

This book aims at readers who support freedom and responsible governments, but do not get too worked up about what other people do in private.

Writing for an American audience, Cooke, an Englishman, rips into right-leaning ideas that are popular in the USA. He offers a new label: Conservatarian.

It’s well written and more thoughtful than most political books written in the US.

From the flap:

“There is an underserved movement budding among conservatives, in which fiscal responsibility, constitutional obedience, and controlled government spending remain crucial tenets, but issues like gay marriage and drug control are approached with a libertarian bent.”

What is Government Good At?

Savoie knows Canadian governments and tears apart the federal bureaucracy, during the Harper years.

It is not another anti-Harper diatribe.

Savoie exposes bureaucracy and shows how it bloats and rots, even under a leader who campaigned against government waste.

This title offers grist to fuel your angst about bureaucracy’s inherent waste.

The Road to Serfdom

If you love everything you hear on the CBC, you will hate Hayek.

It is a sacred text for those who support limited government and free markets.

Please do not read Hayek, if you want higher taxes and more government regulation. You will just grow smarter and make life worse for the rest of us.

The Road to Serfdom is not as easy to read as Friedmans’ Free to Choose, but still worth the effort.  Written in 1944, Hayek reminds us that Hitler came to power democratically.

Roasting Ideas

These titles are dangerous. They will change your thinking about almost everything that goes on in Canada and the US.

As you relax in your lawn chair, cold beverage in hand, I hope you let these authors subvert the messages that bombarded you throughout the rest of the year. I hope you get a chance to scrape off the mushy thinking that sticks to our brains like marshmallows, between September and June.

Enjoy the roast!

Dismissive Reductionism: Brexit & Doctors

The world woke to an unfamiliar place on Friday. Journalists spun like Alice down a rabbit hole.

What’s going on? How did this happen in a modern Europe?

They were quick to explain it: xenophobia, racism, hate, and just plain stupidity.

Megan McArdle, of Bloomberg and the Atlantic, wrote,

“Journalists and academics seemed to feel that they had not made it sufficiently clear that people who oppose open borders are a bunch of racist rubes who couldn’t count to 20 with their shoes on, and hence will believe any daft thing they’re told.”

Rex Murphy, never shy of touching the wart on Grandma’s nose, saw the vote as a rebuke to Western elites.  Maybe Britons didn’t like elites in Brussels passing laws that Britons must follow?

Brexit & Doctors

Doctors in Ontario face a similar divide. Our leader elites cannot explain how the plebes could disagree with them. Health Minister Hoskins attributes greed to dismiss working doctors’ anger at Hoskins’ bumbling mismanagement.  Perhaps docs are just scared and confused, surely it cannot have anything to do with Bill 210.

Dismissive Reductionism

It is easy to dismiss your opponent as motivated by emotion, not reason or argument.

Whether we point to nefarious motives that deserve opprobrium, or humble motives that warrant sympathy, we reduce our opponent’s position to emotion to avoid debate.

We use reductionism to dismiss.

Dismissive reductionism attempts a condescending escape from facing real argument.

It leaves those, who have been dismissed as emotional, to prove that they do not have said emotion, or to prove that, yes, they do deserve to feel their emotional label.

Either way, the discussion is all about emotions.

As every schoolboy knows, emotions mean nothing in a contest. You play to win. Crybabies lose.

Eventually, people catch on. They see elites using the same old dismissive reductionism. At some point, citizens demand a vote.

Pay Attention, Politicians

Deputy Health Minister Bell and Health Minister Hoskins should take note. Regular working doctors cannot be dismissed as angry rubes forever, no matter how much the Deputy and Minister think they know about doctors.

Bell and Hoskins’ past lives a celebrity doctors – one in a world class teaching hospital, the other as global humanitarian – do not qualify them to say much of anything about what it’s like to run an office, in Ontario, on narrow margins.

Deputy Bell loves telling stories about his months working as a GP, 40 years ago. I won a math contest in high school. That doesn’t make me a mathematician.

The Western elites regret ever letting regular people vote on such an important issue, as leaving the EU. How could the plebeians know what’s good for them?

Prime Minister Cameron resigned after the Brexit vote, an honourable move. If only health politics followed this standard.

Doctors have legitimate arguments about the imbroglio in Ontario. Docs cannot be ignored with dismissive reductionism. Doctors will attack in the provincial by-elections, and then, do whatever they can to support voters who are sick of Premier Wynne, in the 2018 election. Will doctors target provincial medical associations next?

photo credit: news.nationalpost.com