No Time For Patient Care?

patient careSome argue that patient care is all or nothing; that we cannot give part of it and still do a great job.  Unless we do a ‘proper job’ and give idealized patient care, we should not even start.  ‘Proper’ care requires thorough examination, investigation, treatment and discharge excellence.  If it isn’t ‘proper’, then you should not do it.

The same people find time to

  • take breaks
  • talk about honeymoon plans
  • visit with police, fire, or ambulance personnel
  • help their colleagues

All this while completing their patient care work.  They find time during the day for things they value by adjusting the time they spend with patients.  Most of the time, this is reasonable.  Each patient requires a different amount of care.

Patient Care: Discrete or Continuous?

Sewing together a skin laceration is a discrete event.  You cannot sew it halfway.  Hanging an IV requires a certain minimum time to complete.  You cannot hang half an IV.  Closing lacerations and hanging IVs are discrete tasks that will always require at concrete minimum of time and effort by even the most efficient provider.

Most patient care depends on providers and patients.  It varies widely.  Some patient histories contain only a few words while others require pages and could go on for days.   Most patient care exists on a continuum from a few seconds, to minutes, to many hours.

Cutting Corners

Patients especially appreciate care when they know we can’t give them the whole deal.  They know and appreciate when corners were cut to provide them some relief, any small help.

Providers, who argue for rigid ratios of nurses or doctors to patients, or ideal numbers of patients seen per hour, think of care as bundles of ideal service.  The same people tend to defend waiting rooms and boarding admitted patients in overcrowded emergency departments.

In a system stretched beyond function, we need to provide some patient care even when we cannot give it all.  We need to do something – anything – for patients suffering and waiting, even if it’s not ideal.  For most patient care, just a few seconds can make a world of difference.

(photocredit: dailymail.co.uk)

Fear Paralyzes Medicare Change

Medicare ChangeAn orange chopper flashed across the blue ribbon of sky between rows of white pines.  I imagined the patient inside, terrified gratitude for the flight paramedics.  At the same time, the ORNGE air ambulance fiasco echoed in my mind:  millions wasted, allegations of criminal negligence, and high-rolling leadership excess (Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, National Post).

Most of us look at health care as patients, potential patients, or friends and family of patients.  Even those of us inside the system, think and speak from a mixture of patient-based anxiety and provider-based self-interest.

One Well to Drink From

Canadians line up for care like drought starved orphans line up for soiled water from a single source, grateful for a drink.  Well owners muddy discussions about dirty water.  They warn that new wells will bankrupt the current well leaving no water for anyone and certain death for orphans.  They march and demonstrate demanding more money for the One Well enlisting orphan survivors in their crusade.

Canadians will not support Medicare change without guarantees that improvement will not compromise the current state.  This axiom strengthens as Medicare weakens.  As Medicare runs out of money, Canadians grow more militant in their defence of the dying legislation.  Like shipwrecked survivors, we place inordinate value on bits of flotsam when no meaningful option exists.

Medicare Change

Essential services upgrades require:

  • a back-up plan and/or support during upgrade
  • smallest steps possible
  • lots of warning for those impacted
  • a fallback position if things do not work out

Medicare zealots must stop unconscionable fear mongering about change and unbiased devotion to outdated legislation.  We should discuss micro-changes to experiment alongside our Medicare mothership.  We should partner with everyone – patients, providers, government, and industry – to explore options that might improve things for Canadians.

It should start with re-examining the 5 principles of Medicare: universality, accessibility, portability, comprehensiveness, and public administration.  If we still believe in them, why aren’t they upheld?  If we do not believe in them, why don’t we change?

We Control Change or Change Controls Us

We can try to orchestrate Medicare change now, or allow stealth privatization and spiralling costs to change things for us.  How would you suggest we keep up with necessary change in Medicare? Will we remain paralyzed by fear?

(photo credit: thestar.com)

 

Compassion Gives You Authority in Healthcare

“You get your authority by how much you care.”  I heard professor Aidan Halligan gave a keynote address last week.  This video captures much of it.  “All of life is a balance between idealism and self-interest.”  Leadership is going into the unknown with courage and compassion.  Courage and compassion gives you leadership.

This 23 minute speech to British medical students applies to all of us.  We all lead.  I hope you have time to watch and comment below.